The State Bank of India, in compliance with an indictment from the Supreme Court, and subsequent public disclosure by the Election Commission, has unveiled the organizations that purchased electoral bonds for political donations. Among the top contributors is Future Gaming and Hotel Services Private Limited, managed by Santiago Martin, famously known as the “Lottery King.” This revelation brings to light a compelling narrative of dreams, fortunes, and political involvement.
Santiago Martin’s journey from a labourer in Myanmar to becoming the “Lottery King” is a story intertwined with aspirations and political controversies. Despite his humble beginnings, Martin carved a niche for himself in India’s political and business landscape. His enterprise was firmly rooted in the lottery industry, promising dreams and fortunes to the masses. According to the Election Commission’s records, Martin’s company purchased electoral bonds worth Rs 1,368 crore from April 2019 to January 2024, positioning him as a significant player in political donations.
At 59 years old, Santiago Martin’s name invokes both reverence and controversy in South India’s business circles. He initially made his mark in Coimbatore, where he founded Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. in 1988 after relocating from Myanmar. The two-digit lottery phenomenon during that era spurred the growth of the brand “Lottery Martin,” laying the foundation for his substantial enterprise.
After establishing his foothold in Coimbatore, Martin expanded his operations to Karnataka and Kerala, eventually acquiring licenses to operate in other states such as Sikkim, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Punjab, and Maharashtra. His business empire flourished on the dreams and expectations of the common people, securing him a significant fortune and considerable influence. However, his rise to power was not without its controversies.
.
In Kerala, a state where lotteries wield significant psychological and economic sway over its residents, Martin’s political entanglements first drew significant attention. In 2008, amidst allegations of defrauding the Sikkim government of over Rs 4,500 crore, he made a noteworthy donation of two crore rupees to CPI(M) mouthpiece Deshabhimani. This move only added fuel to the already heated debate surrounding his political connections and financial dealings.
Since 2019, Martin’s company has been under scrutiny by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for potential violations of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In May 2023, the ED conducted raids in Chennai and Coimbatore as part of their ongoing investigation into the company’s activities. The basis for this probe lies in a charge sheet filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), alleging that Martin’s company sold government-run lotteries from Sikkim in Kerala, raising further questions about the legality of his operations.
Martin’s involvement in the political arena through substantial electoral bonds’ purchases sheds light on a broader issue: the intersection of business, politics, and legal compliance in India. Electoral bonds, introduced as a method to promote transparent political funding, have also sparked debates on the anonymity and influence of significant donors. Martin’s hefty contributions to political causes exemplify the power dynamics at play, where business magnates can potentially sway political decisions and outcomes through financial muscle.
The story of Santiago Martin, while contentious, offers a glimpse into the intricate web of power, finance, and politics. His transition from a modest background to a sprawling business empire, his involvement in political controversies, and his substantial donations through electoral bonds paint a vivid picture of the complexities within India’s political and economic landscape.
As investigations by the ED and CBI continue, the full extent of Martin’s activities and their implications remain to be seen. Regardless, his narrative serves as a stark reminder of the multifaceted relationship between dreams, fortunes, and political influence in contemporary India. The “Lottery King,” a figure both celebrated and criticized, stands as a testament to the intricate dance between ambition and controversy in the quest for power.
