
A transformative directive has recently been issued by the Commerce Ministry, significantly affecting how beverages are categorized on e-commerce platforms such as Amazon, Flipkart, and BigBasket. This shift comes as the Ministry has instructed these platforms to no longer list products like Bournvita, Horlicks, and Protinex under the designation of ‘health drinks.’ This change, which was mandated on April 10, rests on the premise that the term ‘health drink’ finds no definition within the food and safety standards laws of the country.
The advisory issued to the companies in question originates from findings of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR). As per their investigation, there was no evidence in the Food Safety and Standards Act of 2006, or subsequent rules and regulations provided by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and Mondelez India Food, to support the existence of a category known as ‘health drink.’
Although this realignment may seem significant on the surface, industry analysts anticipate minimal impact on the manufacturers of these beverage brands. The underlying reason is that the packaging of these products does not explicitly label them as health products. However, it is possible that any advertising content that presents these beverages as ‘healthy’ or ‘nutritional’ will have to be retracted.
Since FSSAI has already established guidelines pertaining to branding and advertising, any extensive inventories of prohibited promotional material are deemed unlikely. Nonetheless, this re-categorization will necessitate several operational changes – especially within the virtual marketplace.
For platforms operating as marketplaces, like Flipkart and Amazon, the responsibility of reclassifying these beverages will rest with the sellers utilizing these platforms. Here, technological adjustments will be essential, with sellers required to access their accounts and update their product listings accordingly. This process, while straightforward, is likely to consume some time.
Contrastingly, for inventory-led e-commerce services such as BigBasket, the sense of urgency is more acute. Being direct managers of product listings, these platforms must expedite the reclassification process to comply swiftly with the advisory.
As the situation stood on the following Saturday, the e-commerce platforms had yet to update their categorizations, with the aforementioned beverages still being marketed as health and nutritional drinks. The directive, while clear in intent, thus depends on the prompt and effective actions of both the sellers and the e-commerce platforms to execute the necessary changes.
This measure comes as part of a broader initiative to ensure more transparent labeling and advertising across the food and beverage industry. In a market confronted by an increasingly health-conscious consumer base, the definition and marketing of products as ‘health-related’ without official standards lead to potential misinformation. The government’s intervention seeks to provide clarity and prevent brands from leveraging the ‘health’ label without substantiated claims backed by recognized food safety standards.
This shift is more than a mere regulatory hurdle; it is expected to stimulate a broader dialogue about marketing ethics, product transparency, and the responsibility companies should bear in promoting their wares truthfully. As consumers grow more aware and demand greater accuracy in the portrayal of products, it seems inevitable that industries across the board will need to reconsider their marketing strategies under the watchful eye of regulatory authorities.










