In a recent surge to combat illegal online gambling, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has enforced further internet restrictions by issuing blocking requests for a slew of overseas betting platforms. Following thorough investigations, the ACMA pinpointed several gambling services that were violating the Interactive Gambling Act 2001.
The targeted sites include prominent names such as Playzilla, Wazamba, Zet Casino, and Slots Palace. These platforms, according to the ACMA’s findings, were offering prohibited or unlicensed interactive gambling services to Australian customers. The crackdown also encompasses additional websites: Nomini, Casinia, SG Casino, Fez Bet, Buran Casino, Spin Better, Golden Bet, and Clash.gg.
Under Australia’s rigorous gambling regulations, the ACMA possesses the power to direct internet service providers to block access to sites that facilitate illegal betting. This measure has proved to be an assertive method in the agency’s arsenal, designed to protect Australians from the pitfalls of unsanctioned gambling.
Since November 2019, when the ACMA made its inaugural blocking request, efforts to stymie the reach of illicit gambling have been vigorous. To date, the combined tally of gambling and affiliate sites that have been blocked under these initiatives is a staggering 926. These stringent actions have also prompted the withdrawal of over 220 illegal services from the Australian market, showcasing the efficacy of the ACMA’s enforcement strategies.
The ACMA stated in a declaration that “The ACMA is reminding consumers that even if a service looks legitimate, it is unlikely to have important consumer protections. This means our laws can’t help if something goes wrong, like if the service provider withholds winnings.”
Moreover, the ACMA’s regulatory gaze is wide-ranging. In December, the authority targeted four esteemed online gambling brands, which included Ladbrokes and Bet365, over allegations of breaching in-play betting rules. The controversy revolved around the utilization of “Fast/Quick codes,” which allegedly facilitated in-play betting on sports— an activity that runs afoul of Australian gambling law.
The four operators implicated in the breach were Entain-owned Ladbrokes and Neds, as well as Hillside’s Bet365 and Sportsbet. After the accusations were made public, ACMA acknowledged that the brands had ultimately conformed to the regulations. Consequently, ACMA decided against pursuing further enforcement actions against them.
Australia’s stance on in-play sports betting is clear-cut within the Interactive Gambling Act 2001. Such betting is largely prohibited, with a few minor exceptions. These include the condition that wagers placed during a sports event must be conducted via a telephone call, necessitating that the bettor makes an actual voice call to place their bet.
The vigilant enforcement by the ACMA reflects a broader global trend of tightening regulation around online gambling. This serves to reinforce consumer protections and preempt the potential for exploitation. Consumers are generally urged to use licensed and regulated services to ensure they are afforded the full spectrum of legal protections.
As the digital frontier expands, the ever-adaptive nature of the internet continues to present new challenges for regulatory bodies like the ACMA. Ensuring a fair and safe online betting environment is critical for the integrity of the gambling industry and the protection of consumers. These recent actions bear witness to the ACMA’s unwavering commitment to uphold Australian gambling laws and shield the public from illegal and predatory gambling services.
